New Page on the Problem of Evil
I’ve added a page in the menu above about how I deal with the atheist argument from the problem of evil. You can find it there or click here. Enjoy.
Tag: logic
How Unitarians Argue Like Atheists
The Unitarians I respond to on this blog call themselves “Biblical” Unitarians. They believe in God. They say they believe in the Bible. They believe in miracles. The resurrection. Life after death. So how are they like atheists, who deny all these things? I’ve alluded to this in the past, but thought it worth a […]
Is the Trinity Biblical? Watch Debate Now
Bookmark this article for links to video of my recent debate with Andrew Griffin on the Trinity. The debate went long, so I’ll be posting some edits of the debate here if you just want the debaters or want to listen to the moderator questions separately. Here is the version with just the debaters. Here […]
Initial Reflections on Debate with Andrew Griffin on the Trinity
I would just like to start by saying I am very pleased with how the debate went. I would say it definitely went quite a bit longer than expected, due to the moderator questions taking longer even than I think the moderator himself thought they would. I think both debaters were self-controlled and God was […]
Inconsistent Unitarian Arguments: Part 2
In my continuing series evaluating inconsistencies in Unitarian argumentation, I will be looking at a new argument. Once again, this is not, primarily, an argument against Unitarianism, but rather an evaluation of how Unitarians do not use consistent argumentation or interpretation when defending their position. In this article, I will be looking at some more […]
Inconsistent Unitarian Arguments: a Series
A few months back, I uploaded a video in which I examined inconsistencies in Unitarian argumentation. I thought it would be good now to go ahead and do something similar for the blog. If you’ve seen that presentation, some this will be review, but there may be some different insights here. Now, I see this […]
Scriptural Problems Versus Philosophical Problems
In theological debate, you can categorize arguments, generally, into those that are Scriptural in nature and those that are philosophical in nature. When I say “in nature”, I’m referring to the basis of the argument, that thing down at the bottom that really motivates the argument. I’ve come at this issue in a previous article, […]
What Motivates the Argument?
Motivation is a funny thing in debates and arguments. In some cases, it is the only thing on the minds of the people in discussion, so that the actual arguments never get addressed head-on. I’m sure you’ve read news stories about the employees who can only see sinister, selfish motives of the CEO of their […]
My Conversion from Unitarianism to the Trinity
Not that my testimony proves anything, but I share it here to dispel the idea that seems to be common among Unitarians, that Trinitarians are just slaves to tradition, that if you just show the truth to all these uninformed Trinitarians, they will see the light and change. There are plenty of us who were […]
100 Scriptural Arguments for Unitarianism Refuted
At John Schoenheit’s website, Biblical Unitarian, there is an article, promoted prominently, titled “100 Scriptural Arguments”. This is not something written by Schoenheit or anyone at Spirit and Truth Fellowship, but is cited as written in 1825 by Samuel Barrett. So these arguments do not come directly from Schoenheit, but the document is still promoted […]
Beginning of Wisdom 